contact@govacons.com.vn
0938 727 179
This article is for factory owners, project managers and manufacturing businesses preparing construction, renovation or operation of industrial facilities in Vietnam. It is for general orientation only; actual submissions and compliance decisions must be reviewed against project facts, location, filing date and competent-authority practice.
From 1 July 2026, several fire prevention and rescue administrative procedures are cut or simplified under Resolution 66.18/2026/NQ-CP and related Ministry of Public Security implementation. For factory investors, the practical message is simple: the administrative path may become faster, but technical responsibility becomes heavier. This is not a relaxation of fire safety requirements. It is a shift from waiting for an administrative acceptance step toward stronger owner responsibility, internal control and post-inspection readiness.
Before the simplification, many industrial projects treated the fire acceptance stage as a major administrative checkpoint before the facility could move toward operation. The project team often waited for authority inspection or formal acceptance even after construction was substantially completed. Under the new simplification direction, several procedures are no longer performed, including the inspection of fire safety acceptance work and certain acceptance/restoration procedures specified in the new legal framework. This reduces one of the most common late-stage bottlenecks, but it also removes a psychological safety net: the owner can no longer rely on the final administrative step to discover basic inconsistencies.
A factory still has to be designed, built and handed over in accordance with the approved fire safety basis and applicable regulations. Fire compartments, escape routes, smoke control, fire pumps, sprinkler coverage, alarm interlocks, emergency lighting, access for firefighting vehicles and operation documents remain technical obligations. If a project is put into use with hidden deviations, the risk does not disappear; it moves into operation and may be exposed during post-inspection, insurance review, customer audit or an actual incident.
The positive side is significant. A well-prepared project can reduce idle time between construction completion and commercial operation. The project schedule can be planned with fewer administrative waiting points. Investors may reduce indirect costs from delayed installation, delayed production ramp-up and postponed handover to tenants or customers. This is especially meaningful for FDI factories, leased factories, expansion projects and suppliers working under tight delivery commitments.
The disadvantage is that responsibility becomes more concentrated on the investor and the project delivery team. If design changes are not controlled, if shop drawings do not match the approved fire design, if installed materials lack proper certificates, or if test records are weak, the project may still face serious consequences after operation begins. Administrative simplification can therefore punish weak internal management. It rewards teams that prepare early and exposes teams that used to wait until the final inspection to fix accumulated problems.
The old mindset was to complete construction first and solve many fire safety documents near the end. The new mindset should be different: fire safety must be managed from planning, design, procurement and construction through to internal acceptance and operation handover. The most important question is not only whether a procedure is removed, but whether the project has enough evidence to prove that the building is safe and compliant when it is inspected later.
Investors should clarify the real production function, storage height, fire load, chemicals, packaging materials, worker density, access routes, future expansion and equipment layout before the technical design is frozen. In factories, a small operational change may affect fire compartments, sprinkler design, smoke extraction, escape distances and environmental requirements. Early decisions reduce late redesign and help the project reach operation more predictably.
Gova’s value in this context is not only construction execution. The stronger value is integrated project control from planning to operation readiness. That includes reviewing project assumptions, coordinating architecture, structure and MEP with fire safety requirements, controlling construction against the approved design, collecting material and equipment documents, organizing internal tests, preparing handover records and helping the investor stay ready for post-inspection.
Before operation, the investor should check whether the approved fire design version matches the latest construction documents; whether shop drawings and as-built drawings are consistent; whether pumps, valves, alarms, sprinklers, emergency lighting and smoke control have been tested; whether certificates and origin documents are complete; whether operation and maintenance responsibilities are handed over; and whether future layout changes will be controlled by a formal process.
The 2026 administrative simplification is good news for capable investors and disciplined project teams. It can shorten the path to operation. But it also raises the cost of poor preparation. For factory projects, the safer approach is to treat PCCC not as a final paperwork package, but as a control thread running through planning, design, construction, handover and operation.
